12/16/2023 0 Comments Open linkedin pageWhile Medicaid dollars are funded in part by the federal government, state governments allocate the money. Now, President Biden’s commitment to being the “ most pro-union president ever” is coming to fruition: the new rule from HHS once again gives federal blessing to dues skimming.Ī debate exists over whether states or the federal government have the authority to issue policies pertaining to these Medicaid reimbursements. ![]() Then, in 2019, the Trump administration reversed the rule, prohibiting unions from taking Medicaid payments from providers. Cindy Ochoa, who was taking care of her disabled son, Adam, even experienced the union’s forgery of dues authorization signatures to keep the payments flowing. Quinn, at least 11 states allowed dues skimming and unions were able to make providers pay dues by establishing arbitrary opt-out windows that limited when caregivers could leave and stop paying union fees. By 2017, the Freedom Foundation estimated that unions were skimming an estimated $150 million each year, affecting 358,000 caregivers’ Medicaid funds. While providers did not need to pay, unions could still trap them into paying. Supreme Court said unions could not force Pamela Harris - an Illinois mom caring for her son Joshua, who needed constant care for developmental disabilities - to pay union fees.īut that same year, HHS under President Obama adopted a federal rule to explicitly allow Medicaid funds to be diverted to unions. After the SEIU took $34 million from providers like the Hayneses, this unfair policy finally ended.īut caregivers in states such as Illinois, Oregon and Washington had to wait until 2014 before unions could stop forcing them to pay fees to take care of their loved ones. Rick Snyder, legislative reform, lawsuits and the defeat of a ballot measure backed by the unions in a last-ditch effort to keep the dues skim alive. It took years to end the dues skim in Michigan, including administrative action by former Gov. Many members of the “home care workforce” are relatives or friends providing care to sick family members or loved ones in need. Without their permission or intent, the state reclassified the Hayneses as “public employees” at the behest of SEIU - and they had to pay their dues. However, over a decade ago, unions worked with state policymakers in about a dozen states to permit the siphoning of union dues from Medicaid money the Hayneses received. The Hayneses, like other caregivers across the country, are eligible for Medicaid reimbursement from the state for the care they provide to their disabled children.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |